This LibGuide provides information on how to create an assessment plan and promote a culture of assessment in the library. The assessment plan describes an assessment cycle. Assessment never ends. It is a process of continuous improvement in response to changes in student characteristics, the economy, technology, and other factors that affect libraries and institutions of higher education.
The culture of assessment develops best if it receives support from both top down and bottom up. Administration needs to require evidence in the process of decision-making or employees will not do it. And employees need to champion assessment and eventually buy in or it will never be sustainable.
Assessment is the systematic evaluation of the worth or merit of something. There are many different types of assessment--ROI, benchmarking, total quality management, etc. Academia tends to prefer outcomes-based assessment. Outcomes-based assessment is a systematic way to assess whether a program/unit has achieved its intended results. How has my program made a difference? How are the lives of the program participants better as a result of the program? It is outwardly focused on the users of the library or program.
“Outcome-based evaluation is designed to get an organization, such as a library, to answer a crucial question:
We do what, for whom, for what outcomes or benefits?”
Matthews, J. R. (2007). The evaluation and measurement of library services. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited. p. 25.
Library Assessment Cycle
|
An Assessment Plan should include
Maki, P. (2004). Assessing for learning : Building a sustainable commitment across the institution. Sterling, Va: Stylus.
ISU Main Library Stacks - LB2366.2 .M35 2004
The library can't do everything every year and it is not expected. Plan a reasonable assessment schedule to review your data. It is suggested that the library build the data collection into the work routine, when possible, and plan time periods to regularly examine and analyze it.
|
Year One |
Year Two |
Year Three |
|||||||||||||||
OUTCOME: |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Review performance criteria defining outcomes |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||||||||||||
Map activities to a curriculum map |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||||||||||||
Review mapping and identify where data will be collected |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||||||||||||
Develop or review assessment methods |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||||||||||||
Collect and analyze data |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Unfortunately, assessment terminology is inconsistent. Outcomes may be referred to as objectives and objectives may be referred to as outcomes. This guide will use the terminology designated by the Assessment Council of Indiana State University.
The ISU Assessment Council is developing a glossary of standard assessment terms for ISU. It is in progress. The link will be added here when it is completed.